We Don't Design
For Free.
And neither should you.
Here's what you need to know
When someone offers to design your project for free, there's only one thing you can be certain of:
The design is not based on what your project needs.
It's based on what they need to sell.
Think about it
The biggest companies in the world built empires on a simple principle: offer a valuable service for free, then monetise the user.
Free search. Free email. Free social media.
The service isn't the product — you are.
The construction industry works exactly the same way.
Your project becomes a sales channel.
Your specification becomes a shopping list.
Your design becomes an advertisement.
The problem runs deeper than you think.
It's not just manufacturers offering free design to shift stock. The conflicts of interest run through the entire supply chain.
Distributors with in-house design departments
The design is a loss-leader for product sales. The department exists to generate purchase orders.
Distributors who own "independent" studios
The client thinks they hired a consultant. They hired a sales team wearing a design hat.
Consultants who take commissions or kickbacks
Recommendations that are bought, not earned. The best margin wins, not the best product.
The credit-back trick
A design fee that gets refunded when you buy the product through them. The fee is theatre. The lock-in is real.
Different packaging. Same conflict. The designer benefits from what they specify.
Second-best design,
every time.
When the specification serves someone else's interests, the consequences are real.
Incompatible systems
Products that don't work together — because the spec came from one catalogue, not from a system-level design.
Vendor lock-in
Locked into one manufacturer's ecosystem. Can't change a single component without redesigning the whole system.
No competitive pricing
You can't tender a proprietary specification. You pay whatever they charge.
Abandonment after the sale
The "designer" disappears once the purchase order is signed. Who commissions? Who troubleshoots? Who takes the 2am call?
Innovation dies
New, better products never get specified — because the designer's relationship is with the brand that pays them, not the brand that's best for you.
The real cost
Rework. Delays. Compromised outcomes. The "free" design ends up costing more than the fee you avoided paying.
What compromised design costs you
Independence.
Objectivity.
The best solution.
Competitive pricing.
Accountability.
A designer who's still there when things go wrong.
What independent design gives you
Every manufacturer evaluated on merit.
A specification that can be competitively tendered — driving cost down.
A designer who advocates for the project, not the supplier.
Freedom to change direction mid-project without blowing the budget.
Someone who's still answering the phone during commissioning — because their fee covers the whole project, not just the sale.
The excuses.
"But it saves the client money"
It costs more in the long run. Rework, incompatibility, vendor lock-in.
"But the manufacturer knows their products best"
An independent designer knows ALL the products. That's the point.
"But everyone does it"
That doesn't make it right.
"But the client asked for it"
The client asked for design. Not a sales pitch disguised as one.
"But we disclose our conflicts of interest"
Disclosure isn't independence. A doctor who tells you they're paid to prescribe a drug is still compromised. Even the IALD used to ban commissions outright — now they just require disclosure. We think they had it right the first time.
"But we need the relationship with the manufacturer"
If the relationship depends on specifying their products regardless of merit, it's not a professional relationship. It's a transaction.
Commissioning a design?
Ask these questions.
A good designer will be proud to answer them.
Do you sell, supply, or install any of the products you specify?
Do you receive commissions, referral fees, or volume incentives from any manufacturer or distributor?
Are you affiliated with, owned by, or part-owned by any product supplier?
If I buy the products elsewhere, does your fee change?
Can you show me a project where you specified a competitor's product over a partner's?
If they get uncomfortable — you have your answer.
Why this exists.
This isn't theory. I used to run a distributor's design department. I saw from the inside how it works — the design exists to sell product, and the client rarely knows the difference.
That's why I left. That's why I started an independent practice. And that's why this site exists.
I'm not naming names. I'm still on good terms with my former colleagues. This isn't about calling out individuals — it's about changing a system that puts product sales ahead of project outcomes.
Martin Robert
Emittiv Lighting Design Consultancy, Dubai
"Being independent means we have no commercial allegiance to any lighting equipment suppliers or manufacturers — and therefore we are able to offer professional and completely impartial advice and design expertise to our clients."
Nathan Savage
Nathan Savage Lighting Design, Dubai — a fellow independent who's been making this argument for years.
Take the pledge.
We believe design has value. We pledge to charge for our work, recommend objectively, and put the project first. Add your company to stand publicly for independent design.
Lighting Design
Lighting Design
Listed in random order — no ranking or preference implied.